LOL, unfortunately I have someone arguing that it can be done the other way
because "those heads have a larger area of coverage".
In my opinion they are twisting the definitions of "adjacent" and
"hydraulically most demanding" to include the sprinklers that cover the
largest area but in my opinion the largest floor space doesn't
necessarily present as the most demanding.

I will be on Holidays from August 12th to 21st, returning to work on
Tuesday August 22nd

Thanks

Brett Peters
General Manager Installation & Design
Proudline Fire Protection Services Ltd.
br...@proudline.ca
780 490 7602 office ext 202
780 490 7605 fax
780 777 0568 cell
780 718 2676 24h
Visit us at www.proudline.ca

Proudline now offers ULc listed monitoring services, please contact
a...@proudline.ca for more information






On Thu, Jul 20, 2023 at 9:31 AM Chris Dorn <
chris.d...@dornfireprotection.com> wrote:

> Brett,
>
> I think you answered your own question. “I always choose whatever gives me
> the greatest pressure loss not necessarily the larger flow.” Wouldn’t that
> by definition be the hydraulically most demanding area regardless of
> location? It’s exactly what I do also in this situation.
>
> Chris Dorn
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Brett Peters <br...@proudline.ca>
> *Sent:* Thursday, July 20, 2023 11:15 AM
> *To:* Sprinklerforum <sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org>
> *Subject:* [Sprinklerforum] Residential Design in NFPA 13
>
>
>
> Having a debate on which sprinklers actually have to be part of the
> hydraulic calculation in a residential unit in a 13 building (So the
> calculation has to include 4 sprinklers) - NFPA 13, 2013
>
>
>
> 11.3.1.1* The design area shall be the area that includes the four
> adjacent sprinklers that produce
>
> the greatest hydraulic demand.
>
>
>
> With 11.3.1.1 in mind if you have a space where you have less than 4
> sprinklers in a compartment and you have to start adding sprinklers in
> other compartments to come up with 4 in the calculation, what is the method
> that you have to use?
>
> So for arguments sake this scenario is 2 sprinklers in one compartment and
> then two "adjacent" sprinklers outside of that compartment but there are
> sprinklers in different directions that can be considered as "adjacent"
>
>    1. Adding sprinklers from the next compartment on a different
>    sprinkler line which would qualify as an "adjacent sprinkler" and
>    potentially have 4 sprinklers fed form 3 different lines or
>    2. adding "adjacent sprinklers" that are first on a common sprinkler
>    line and potentially having 3 sprinklers on a single line.
>
> My argument is that scenario 2 has to be followed as that would produce
> the largest demand to a sprinkler line and if required increase the size of
> that line.
>
> The other argument is that in scenario 1 they are picking the "adjacent
> sprinkler" that has a larger protection area, so the actual water flow
> might be slightly higher but it spreads the flow through 3 different lines
> instead of only 2
>
>
>
> So scenario 1 has more flow but less pressure loss resulting in smaller
> piping and scenario 2 has less flow but more pressure loss requiring larger
> pipe to be installed.
>
>
>
> So what are other people doing in these situations and what is really
> considered as producing the greatest hydraulic demand? I always choose
> whatever gives me the greatest pressure loss not necessarily the larger
> flow.
>
>
>
> I will be on Holidays from August 12th to 21st, returning to work on
> Tuesday August 22nd
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
> Brett Peters
>
> General Manager Installation & Design
>
> Proudline Fire Protection Services Ltd.
>
> br...@proudline.ca
>
> 780 490 7602 office ext 202
>
> 780 490 7605 fax
>
> 780 777 0568 cell
>
> 780 718 2676 24h
>
> Visit us at www.proudline.ca
>
>
>
> Proudline now offers ULc listed monitoring services, please contact
> a...@proudline.ca for more information
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _________________________________________________________
> SprinklerForum mailing list:
> https://lists.firesprinkler.org/list/sprinklerforum.lists.firesprinkler.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to
> sprinklerforum-le...@lists.firesprinkler.org
>
_________________________________________________________
SprinklerForum mailing list:
https://lists.firesprinkler.org/list/sprinklerforum.lists.firesprinkler.org
To unsubscribe send an email to sprinklerforum-le...@lists.firesprinkler.org

Reply via email to