On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 12:56 PM, <jus...@postgresql.org> wrote: > On 2014-11-10 18:33, RSmith wrote: > <snip> > >> There is one Client-Server implementation of SQLite (SQLightening I >> think) but it is neither free nor easy to convert to. >> > > Doing some Googling, this looks like the thing: > > http://sqlitening.com > > They don't seem to sell it any more (last version was released Dec > 2012), though the support forums are still online. > > > You can write >> your own server too, but the best bet is using MySQL or PostGres in >> these cases. >> > > Use PostgreSQL (www.postgresql.org). :) > > This is kinda interesting btw. Keynote speaker for PGCon 2014 was > Richard Hipp: > > SQLite: Protégé of PostgreSQL > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZvmMzI0X7fE
Sorry for the previous noise. Clicked send instead of expanding the quotes. Anyway, I've given a little thought in the past to creating a VFS for SQLite that actually communicates with a "server". That server would be a replacement for the buggy network file system implementations that plague SQLite for networked use. Of course, it would no longer be a zero configuration completely embedded system, but it would be a fairly minimal shim. Of course, it would itself require debugging, so it's not like it would be a magical solution. Still, if the SQLite "service" just exposed a virtual block device with accurate locking, I could see it being a useful complement. -- Scott Robison _______________________________________________ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@sqlite.org http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
