Dominick, On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 9:24 AM, Dominique Devienne <ddevie...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 2:42 PM, Keith Medcalf <kmedc...@dessus.com> wrote: > >> [...] The main problem with the JOIN/ON syntax is that to a casual reading >> order is implied > > > No idea what you mean here :) > > >> ([...] ream of brackets [...]). >> > > Nor what this has to do with JOIN/ON. Get off the anti-MS soapbox Keith ;)
For the "average Joe" the JOIN/ON" syntax is weird. So I have no idea why MS does it this way, since that's their target audience. ;-) > > >> TO me it is much simpler to understand: >> > > I guess we agree to disagree on this one. To each his own. And both forms > are valid of course. --DD And if you need to filter results, you don't have a choice, but use WHERE... Thank you. > _______________________________________________ > sqlite-users mailing list > sqlite-users@mailinglists.sqlite.org > http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users _______________________________________________ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@mailinglists.sqlite.org http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
