Riccardo Castellani wrote:
Ok, but about level package updates frequency ?

Code gets into Debian, then migrates to Ubuntu from there after a further short delay.


About most supported hardware ?
same.

About stability ?
same.



----- Original Message ----- From: "Amos Jeffries" <squ...@treenet.co.nz>
To: "Riccardo Castellani" <ric.castell...@alice.it>
Cc: <squid-users@squid-cache.org>
Sent: Friday, April 03, 2009 11:09 PM
Subject: Re: [squid-users] Squid : better on Debian or Ubunto server ?


Riccardo Castellani wrote:
I don't understand.

The big difference between Debian and Ubuntu is the X server/kde/gnome GUI interface. Once you eliminate that you may as well flip a coin to choose.

Amos

----- Original Message ----- From: "Amos Jeffries" <squ...@treenet.co.nz>
To: "Riccardo Castellani" <ric.castell...@alice.it>
Cc: <squid-users@squid-cache.org>
Sent: Friday, April 03, 2009 10:59 PM
Subject: Re: [squid-users] Squid : better on Debian or Ubunto server ?


Riccardo Castellani wrote:
I have to install new Linux server, based on ONLY on text console (not
X server, not kde, not gnome) to having squid as parent cache.
Then I have to configure sendmail which relays messages to 3 perimetral mail servers.

I'm thinking to install Debian or Ubuntu server but what do you
suggest me ?

Up to you. Ubuntu is a child OS built on top of Debian.
From the console they are almost identical.

I find the delay in package updates annoying in Ubuntu, particularly since they cop it from their own release freezes, and from the Debian freezes once a year. But I'm an unashamed neophyte.

Amos
--
Please be using
  Current Stable Squid 2.7.STABLE6 or 3.0.STABLE13
  Current Beta Squid 3.1.0.6


--
Please be using
  Current Stable Squid 2.7.STABLE6 or 3.0.STABLE13
Current Beta Squid 3.1.0.6



--
Please be using
  Current Stable Squid 2.7.STABLE6 or 3.0.STABLE13
  Current Beta Squid 3.1.0.6

Reply via email to