On 07.01.14 02:23, Richard Tew wrote:
No, I just want to be clear on what everyone expects to get out of it.
For me, as I understand it, it's 2.x with whatever whomever wishes to
backport from 3.x, included. Therefore, to some degree it would also
serve (with no extra work than any of us plans) as an intermediate
point that lessens effort in migrating to 3.x by being somewhere in
between.
I think that renaming the executable is what you should do. People
can alias to 'python' as they please.
Very much agreed!
That is what I'm going to do consequently,
and quite probably this is the best to do in the future, too!
But let us try it with 2.8 first. If people like what they get, then we
should
consider to extend the renaming.
all the best -- Chris
--
Christian Tismer :^) <mailto:[email protected]>
Software Consulting : Have a break! Take a ride on Python's
Karl-Liebknecht-Str. 121 : *Starship* http://starship.python.net/
14482 Potsdam : PGP key -> http://pgp.uni-mainz.de
phone +49 173 24 18 776 fax +49 (30) 700143-0023
PGP 0x57F3BF04 9064 F4E1 D754 C2FF 1619 305B C09C 5A3B 57F3 BF04
whom do you want to sponsor today? http://www.stackless.com/
_______________________________________________
Stackless mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.stackless.com/mailman/listinfo/stackless
