On Thursday, Jul 10, 2003, at 15:18 America/Denver, Mark Galbreath wrote:

Is this the same David Geary that wrote, among others, "Advanced JavaServer
Pages?"

Yes.



david

Mark


-----Original Message-----
From: David Geary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2003 5:09 PM
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: Using JSTL tags instead of Struts tags


On Thursday, Jul 10, 2003, at 14:40 America/Denver, David Graham wrote:


The work that you do with JSTL, and therefore in JSP pages instead of
actions, involves activities like iterating over data, conditional
tests, accessing URLs, i18n, xml manipulation and database access.
Except for database updates and transactions, all of those activities
are well within the perview of a view.

So you're advocating placing some database logic in the view and some in Java classes? I've had to maintain apps written that way and it was a complete nightmare. The view has absolutely no business querying the database in all but the simplest apps (3 pages max).

No, I'm just saying that reading the database from a view is sometimes a viable alternative for smaller applications, especially if you encapsulate reading the database within the view itself.

I realize I'm bucking traditional wisdom but I don't like to see
<sql:query> lumped together with <sql:update> and <sql:transaction>.
The last two are much more offensive than the first.


david



David




david


I'm open to views against mine, and I also wouldn't dismiss the advise

of the folks who developed struts, but whenever I read "use JSLT" it
seems to me  a step backwards.

On Thursday, July 10, 2003, at 03:05 PM, Hookom, Jacob wrote:


Start using it and you will :-). The expression language is the best thing since sliced bread.

David
I agree, I'm even using the EL parser to do stuff on completely
different layers for scripting logic.  Also, you can VERY easily
use JSTL's parsing
objects in your own tags to make them a little more flexible.
Jacob


- Keith



-----Original Message----- From: David Graham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2003 9:51 AM To: Struts Users Mailing List Subject: RE: Using JSTL tags instead of Struts tags


I don't have any documentation but the only Struts taglibs I use are html and tiles. I replaced my usage of the bean tags with the <fmt:message> tag and the Struts logic tags are all replaced with a combination of

the
<c:if> and <c:forEach> tags plus the expression language.

The JSPs are remarkably easy to maintain and debug using this
strategy because there aren't any scriptlets or complicated
business logic
in
them.

David

--- "Kamholz, Keith (corp-staff) USX" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'd be interested in finding out about this too.


-----Original Message----- From: White, Joshua A (HTSC, CASD)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2003 7:30 AM
To: 'Struts Users Mailing List'
Subject: Using JSTL tags instead of Struts tags


A previous thread had encouraged me to look into JSTL. It looks like there are several tags which I could use instead of Struts tags. Has anyone come across any documentation about experiences doing this (benefits, drawbacks, caveats)? Anyone care to share their experience?

Joshua


This communication, including attachments, is for the exclusive use

of

addressee and may contain proprietary, confidential or privileged
information. If you are not the intended recipient, any use,
copying, disclosure, dissemination or distribution is strictly
prohibited.
If
you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender
immediately by return email and delete this communication and
destroy all
copies.



--------------------------------------------------------------------
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


--------------------------------------------------------------------
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month! http://sbc.yahoo.com


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!
http://sbc.yahoo.com

------------------------------------------------------------------- -
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


------------------------------------------------------------------- -
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




-------------------------------------------------------------------- -
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!
http://sbc.yahoo.com

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Reply via email to