On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 3:28 PM, Jonas Smedegaard <d...@jones.dk> wrote: > On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 01:23:22PM -0500, Wade Brainerd wrote: >> >> Anecdote: My XO ran out of space over Thanksgiving and automatically >> deleted Browse at boot time. I downloaded the latest version, but it failed >> to launch as my XO is running the OLPC 8.2.0 build. This was pretty >> annoying to me as I didn't have a web browser available to go find out which >> version *would* work. > > Hmmm - I believe we were promised that ASLO would ensure that only > Activities supported by the client branch of Sugar would be served. > > Was that a brain fart of mine, a single glitch in an otherwise reliable ASLO > version handling, or whould we simply warn Sugar 0.82 users to *not* use > ASLO?
ASLO does that by checking for the Browse user agent - in my situation, I had to use scp to download Browse from download.sugarlabs.org. Still, the latest Browse is only about 3400 lines of Python code - I wonder how hard it would be to make it backwards compatible with 0.82. Wade _______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel