On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 03:38:26PM -0500, Wade Brainerd wrote:
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 3:28 PM, Jonas Smedegaard <d...@jones.dk> wrote:On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 01:23:22PM -0500, Wade Brainerd wrote:Anecdote: My XO ran out of space over Thanksgiving and automatically deleted Browse at boot time. I downloaded the latest version, but it failed to launch as my XO is running the OLPC 8.2.0 build. This was pretty annoying to me as I didn't have a web browser available to go find out which version *would* work.Hmmm - I believe we were promised that ASLO would ensure that only Activities supported by the client branch of Sugar would be served.Was that a brain fart of mine, a single glitch in an otherwise reliable ASLO version handling, or whould we simply warn Sugar 0.82 users to *not* use ASLO?ASLO does that by checking for the Browse user agent - in my situation, I had to use scp to download Browse from download.sugarlabs.org.
Ahh, makes sense then :-)
Still, the latest Browse is only about 3400 lines of Python code - I wonder how hard it would be to make it backwards compatible with 0.82.
I'll leave that to the real programmers :-) - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel