Hi Geoff, 

Your most interesting ‘penumbral’ comment also raises another possibility that 
this could be a tad more interesting if we can believe a ‘throw away’, and not 
fully explained, comment about the monument which suggests a question that 
there might be still more to the design than we thought.

“The ellipses of the Anthem Veterans Memorial will form a circle of light once 
a year, but we can only experience the eleventh year once in a hundred years.”

Maybe this might also be connected with the odd proliferation of the number 11 
in the engineer’s explanation?

It occurs in this link:

http://www.isisinform.com/category/memorials/anthem-veterans-memorial/

Regards

Patrick




From: Frank King 
Sent: Saturday, January 21, 2017 2:59 PM
To: Geoff Thurston 
Cc: John Goodman ; Sundial List 
Subject: Re: Unusual bi-annual sundial

Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
--------
Dear Geoff,

As so often, you cause me to reflect a
little and to refine my analysis...

> I wonder if the errors might be masked
> by the 32 arc minute solar penumbra.

In pondering this "instrument" I made
the naive assumption that we had an
ordinary aperture nodus.  It IS an
aperture nodus but it is hardly
ordinary...

Imagine a bug sitting at the centre
of the Great Seal and looking up the
array of elliptical openings.

We can think of the bug looking along
a tube which has a uniform elliptical
cross-section along its length.

Of course, to the bug, the far end of
the tube appears smaller than the near
end.  From photographs, I estimate
that the angular separation of the top
and bottom of the far end of the tube
is about 4 degrees or about 8 times
the diameter of the solar disc.  The
angular width is about 11 solar discs.

Although we are referring to the far
end of the tube, it is still many times
larger than the apparent diameter of
the solar disc.

The tube is therefore much too big to
be regarded as a shadow-sharpener and,
when investigating the patch of light
on the ground in the vicinity of the
Great Seal, we can deem the relevant
aperture to be the hole in the nearest
face of the shortest column.  This is
the hole closest to the Great Seal.

The only effect of the long tube is
to limit the range of declinations
and the range of hour-angles for
which the relevant aperture can give
rise to a full patch of light.

Clearly this is several days either
side of 11 November and several
minutes either side of 11:11.

When the patch of light is anywhere
near the Great Seal we can ignore
every aspect of the tube except the
nearest hole.

It is a great pity that the time lapse
video doesn't start early enough to
see just when the patch starts to
appear "full".  Otherwise I could
determine the dimensions with more
precision.

I did say at the outset that this is
a whole can of worms!

OK, that's a preliminary.  Now to
your pertinent observation...

I am sure you are right.  At 11:11
the extreme altitudes over the
10 year period are +/- 5.5 arc
minutes either side of the mean.

The fuzz at the top and bottom of
the patch of lighe illuminating the
Great Seal will always be around
+/- 16 arc minutes (half the solar
diameter) which is definitely a
greater range.

That said, the many photographs
of the spot of light at the
critical instant seem to show
the top edge of the Great Seal
not quite fully illuminated.

It is a very small effect but
it does make me wonder whether
the Great Seal has been put in
the correct place.

It would be most interesting to
see photographs on 12 November
when the declination and hence
altitude are slightly lower
and the patch would be further
out.

I think there would be a slight
over-correction and we would
conclude that the design date
of 11 November is better.

My concluding thought is that
there should be a removable
Great Seal printed on some
high-quality material and
treated with due respect.

Each year, Anthem's official
astronomer would oversee the
placing of the Great Seal
in the exact position for
the declination this time
round!

Very best wishes

Frank


---------------------------------------------------
https://lists.uni-koeln.de/mailman/listinfo/sundial
---------------------------------------------------
https://lists.uni-koeln.de/mailman/listinfo/sundial

Reply via email to