Correction:

I'd said:

(Tan dec)(R*2Sin(h) ).

...where h is the number hours from 12 noon.where R is the cylinder's
radius.

Here's the correction:

Instead of "hours from 12 noon",

It should say:

"...where h is 15 degrees times the number of hours from 6 a.m., during the
a.m. hours, or the number of hours from 6 p.m., during the p.m. hours."

...which could also be said as: " 15 degrees times (6 minus the number of
hours from 12 noon)".

...for the hours from 6 a.m. to 6 p.m.

Michael Ossipoff


On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 7:31 PM, Michael Ossipoff <email9648...@gmail.com>
wrote:

>
> In the Hemicyclium discussion, the OP mentioned having 6-inch copper
> tubing. So, though it was a bit off-topic, I suggested that the tubing
> could be used for an additional, quicker, project, to make a south
> windowsill sundial--a Circumference-Aprerture Cylindrical Equatorial Dial.
>
> But, when I said that the axial dimension of the cylinder has to be at
> least 0.4335 times the diameter, I neglected the fact that there are south
> declinations as well as north declinations. (...funny, because we're in
> south declination now) So, with the circumference aperture in the middle of
> the cylinder, the cylinder's axial dimension has to be at least twice
> 0.4335, which is about 0.867 times the diameter.
>
> But my suggestion for marking points of the declination-lines for each
> hour was correct:
>
> At any hour-line, the axial displacement of a declination-line from the
> equinox-line is equal to the tangent of the declination times the direct
> distance between the circumference aperture and the intersection of that
> hour-line with the equinox-line
>
> That amounts to:
>
> (Tan dec)(R*2Sin(h) ).
>
> ...where h is the number hours from 12 noon.where R is the cylinderr's
> radius.
>
> Obviously more neatly written:
>
> (Tan dec)(DSin(h) ).
>
> ...where D is the diameter of the cylinder.
> -------------------------
>
> But a cone would be better than a cylinder, because it opens toward the
> north, the direction from which it would be observed--making it readable
> from a wider-range of directions, and making the inside surface more
> readable in generral. The use of a cone just slightly more complicates the
> declination-lines, but that would take this post even more off-topic.
> --------------------------
>
> I mentioned that I'd read of a drinking-cup with a hole in it being used
> as a cylindrical sundial. Of course if it were a Cylindrical Equatorial,
> orienting it just by estimation wouldn't give very accurate results. (A
> Cylindrical Equatorial is supposed to be a *mounted* dial, not a portable
> dial).
>
> But actually, maybe they were talking about a Cylindrical *Altitude*
> Dial. But, though that avoids the direction-estimation, the drinking-cup
> would need a way of hanging it in the right orientation, and so it wouldn't
> be much like an ordinary drinking-cup. ...and the line-marking would be
> complicated by the non-cylindrical shape of the cup.
>
> Michael Ossipoff
>
> On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 8:48 AM, Brad Thayer <wissenschaft...@verizon.net>
> wrote:
>
>> I am looking to make a hemicyclium-type sundial (half-hemisphere) in a
>> metal working class.  What little I can find on them says they are
>> inaccurate, without being very clear on the problem.  It appears to me the
>> only issue is it needs to be tilted so that the gnomon aligns with the
>> Earth’s rotation axis; thus the half-bowl faces south and the gnomon points
>> south, but the end of the gnomon that attaches to the bowl points north.
>> Am I missing anything?  I am also looking to use an analemma-shaped gnomon
>> to cast the shadow on the bowl, and at least month lines for the solar
>> elevation.  The bowl will also have a rod and bracket on the bottom to
>> allow it to be rotated for daylight-savings time and for local longitude
>> corrections.
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks in advance -- Brad
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------
>> https://lists.uni-koeln.de/mailman/listinfo/sundial
>>
>>
>>
>
---------------------------------------------------
https://lists.uni-koeln.de/mailman/listinfo/sundial

Reply via email to