Dear Saied,
I'm sorry we were very lazy to take a decision.
However as you know something perfect doesn't allow people to comment,
so in this way we may lead someone to discuss with us of something ;-)
I would say to froze the Manifesto (of course not the subscribers) . If
clarification of the statements reported in the Manifesto is needed (we
had only 3 pages) , then we can write compendium docs, or white papers.
I think we need to smoothly discuss and compare the different positions
we have and this could lead to the revision of the Manifesto by the next
year ...
However yesterday Casper printed all the material for the AAL Forum and
today the brochure of the EvAAL contest.
soon other news
francesco
Il 08/09/2010 10.57, Mohammad-Reza Tazari ha scritto:
Thanks FrancescoP for the feedback, which I evaluate as a positive
vote :-)
Also based on feedback from Joe (actually, he was mainly warning that
this could be wasting time and energy discussing something of only
very minor importance, but he also criticized not only the phrase with
"hit" but also its too broad formulation covering everything for
everybody), I modified the def:
  employing technology to support well-being in diverse situations
  of life, especially in specific spaces, such as the living and
  working environments, with a priority for people who might be
  more in need of assistance (e.g. infirm or very elderly people)
In the spirit of the first ideas being exchanged among promoters with
regard to procedures, I suggest that the authors of the manifesto
consider a change in the above direction if at least two other
positive votes but no objections are there. To avoid delays in
finalizing the prints for AAL forum, today is practically the last
chance for voting on this suggestion, where an objection should be
evaluated as a veto without long discussions.
My regards,
-- Saied
Francesco Potortì wrote on 06-Sep-10 13:13:
1. citation from the manifesto:
   making smart use of technology to support well-being in the
   preferred living environment for people who might otherwise
   find this difficult (e.g. infirm or very elderly people who
   want to continue living in their own homes)
[...]
Hence, I just suggest to change it the following way:
   employing technology to support well-being for everyone in all
   situation of life, with a priority for people who might be hit
   more by need for assistance (e.g. infirm or very elderly people)
I like the idea and the new text.
I think it could be improved (but I do not know how) by rephrasing
"might be hit by more need for assistance" into something more fluent.
_______________________________________________
Supporters mailing list
Supporters@aaloa.org
http://aaloa.org/mailman/listinfo/supporters
_______________________________________________
Supporters mailing list
Supporters@aaloa.org
http://aaloa.org/mailman/listinfo/supporters