One of the reasons the big oil companies don't buy up this technology - they have seen thousands of additives that don't do what they say. The second might be that if fuel sales dropped 10%, so would their profits. They are getting a start - see Lubrizol's PuriNOx at www.Lubrizol.com. This is a water 20% emulsification that is blended with diesel (80%) that Chevron/Texaco in the US and BP in Europe are blending it into some of their diesel.
We found a product that works great and are supporting it 1000%. Dipetane. See www.dipetaneusa.com and www.dipetane.com. We got behind it because of the lab reports reflecting 60% reduction in Particulates, 33% reduction in NOx, 23% reduction in SOx and 15% reduction C02. It also gets better combustion for reduced fuel consumption. Combine Dipetane with B100 and field tests are showing 15% better feul economy. Sorry if this sounds like a comercial, but we are excited about the potential of this find. One other item, lab tests show that it absorbs MYBE and is suitable for gasoline. In [EMAIL PROTECTED], "motie_d" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > --- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Keith Addison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > What d'you think of all this then? > > > > http://www.solpower.com/soltron/soltronmain.asp > > Solpower Corporation - Soltron > > > > http://thestar.com.my/lifestyle/story.asp? > file=/2002/5/7/features/hrfu > > el&newspage=Search > > > > Tuesday, May 7, 2002 > > > > Fuel-enhancer making inroads > > By HILARY CHIEW > > > > HOW would you like to cut your monthly petrol bill by 10% and help > > reduce global warming at the same time? This is achievable if you > mix > > 20ml of a fuel additive to 100 litres of fuel in your petrol tank, > > claims the manufacturer of Soltron, the latest organic-based > > fuel-enhancing agent for motor vehicles in the market. > > > > Soltron is said to contain organic enzymes that break down the > > molecular structure of fuel and its contaminants, so that it > becomes > > easily combustible. > > > I'll have to reserve my opinion, pending further information. The > primary info would be what they are defining as contaminants, and the > level of it's presence. > If they are beginning with some very badly contaminated fuel, I can > see some potential for improvements. > My 'radar' was alerted when they are selling it for use as a > treatment at the consumer level. If it is as good as claimed, why > aren't the refiners and/or fuel retail marketers buying it up to > treat ALL their fuels? > > Motie ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~--> Buy Stock for $4 and no minimums. FREE Money 2002. http://us.click.yahoo.com/orkH0C/n97DAA/Ey.GAA/FGYolB/TM ---------------------------------------------------------------------~-> Biofuel at Journey to Forever: http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html Biofuels list archives: http://archive.nnytech.net/ Please do NOT send "unsubscribe" messages to the list address. To unsubscribe, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
