Chandra >Kieth: >How nice of you to post (see below) the accurate remarks of mine. As >you can see, it says "MANY" urchins on this site. It does not say >"ALL" on this site are urchins. I have respect for those who strive >to make this site productive and you tops the list. >It is unfortunate that in your earnestness you have inadvertently >included yourself in that list of "many urchins". You even took step >to include others in the list!
It was clear what you meant and who you were directing it at and I have not misinterpreted it. Nor have I misinterpreted your ill-masked intentions in posting it again here now: > ... pretending to be promoting peace, sweetness and light and >pouring oil on troubled waters, but in fact just insulting people, >and the whole list, and trying to stir it up. >When I say urchins in this site, it does not mean all of those who >come on this site are urchins. >Sure those who concentrate on arguing on personal issues are >urchins. Of course, personal attacks do appear frequently in this >site. So, I openly said there are some urchins here. If we are >matured people, we should not waste our time ( and others time) on >personal attacks! That depends. I'm attacking you personally right now, and it's because of your consistent behaviour here, not my lack of maturity. And your rationalisations fail to address that. >We all are interested to see BD issues discussed and we are here to >learn from those who know things (BD) better than us. Is it not a >waste of time and efforts to attack one another on personal basis? >I called such people urchins. I did not mean they are bad, but just >urchins who do not know how they are wasting their (and others') >time and energy. They are just like inexperienced kids! That is all >to it! No it's not, it's seldom that simple, as indeed in this case that you butted into. I doubt they'll go too far but if they do I'll be the one to stop them, that's my job, not yours. And I don't believe that was your intention. >Now, I prefer not to fall into the same trap. You did just that. In fact you leapt into it with some glee, and not for the first time. >Instead, let me go along learning more about BD from other ones who >are NOT urchins in this site (the ones who are learned and >experienced ones). Hope this makes those who are not urchins in >this site happy. I doubt anyone will accept your definitions. I certainly don't. >If anyone in this site feels that he or she falls into the category >of learned ones, then, my observation does not apply to them, and >so, they should not be concerned and hence, they would ignore >useless things and get along with their productive work. On the >other hand, if any one feels my observations and remarks directly >apply to their activities, then, is it not time for them to look >into themselves? It was time for you to look into yourself, you were called upon to do so and you've failed to do so. >I decide NOT to waste other peoples' time any more. You should take that decision seriously Chandra. There might not be a "next time". This discussion is now closed. Keith Addison Moderator > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Keith Addison > To: biofuel@yahoogroups.com > Cc: Shukrainternationals > Sent: Friday, June 07, 2002 5:13 AM > Subject: Re: [biofuel] EPA Ruling Backfires, Spurs Sales of Diesel Trucks > > > chandra_the_good wrote, getting it all wrong as usual: > > >On the lighter side of the issue though: > >Once, by mistake, I placed a statement (below) on this site (while > >trying to send it to a friend of mine privately): It said, "you > >know, Tom, this site is crowed with urchins, so, don't worry....". > >Now, I feel was not wrong after all!! :). > >Now, again, this on the lighter side of life please :) - It means 'smile'. > > First it wasn't this "site" (list), it was the Biofuels-biz list. > Second, you've misquoted yourself - this is what you said: > > "Tom: > I see a response from David Teal to your posting on the web. I suggest you > just ignore it and continue with our project. As I said, these are many > urchins on that web site and we should try to stay above them. > -Chandra" > > This was in response to several posts that questioned an original > post which that person (Tom) subsequently withdrew, with apologies. > Your "urchins", which included me and others along with David Teal, > have all contributed a great deal to the biofuels movement, whereas > if you've contributed anything at all except snide comments that you > then slide away from when challenged, and requests for other people > to do your homework for you, it's remarkably invisible. > > At the time, all concerned refrained from stirring the issue up any > further by challenging you over this as you deserved. They showed > restraint - unlike you, here and now. Typical chandra_the_good, > pretending to be promoting peace, sweetness and light and pouring oil > on troubled waters, but in fact just insulting people, and the whole > list, and trying to stir it up. You just don't realise how > transparent you are, Chandra, but everyone else can see it. I know > that because many of them tell me so off-list. > > So, no sliding away this time, explain yourself please. Response > required, on-list, and make it snappy. > > Keith Addison > Moderator Biofuel at Journey to Forever: http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html Biofuels list archives: http://archive.nnytech.net/ Please do NOT send "unsubscribe" messages to the list address. To unsubscribe, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
