Ianal, but I'm quite sure the gpl does't preclude distributing or
executing a gpl program. You should read the license, though. If you
distribute, you need to include a copy of the license and provide a
link to the sources.
I'd recommend using CreateProcess instead of ShellExecute...
Have you considered an alternative business plan ?
There's an alternate business plan?
Piers.
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 2, 2010, at 9:07 AM, <i...@microsystools.com> wrote:
Hi,
of distributing unmodifiable software is antisocial and should
I don't know where you got the part of me distributing swfmill?
I explicitly said I was NOT going to distribute ANY part of swfmill.
I merely want to make an option if users had
downloaded and installed swfmill themselves already.
I have no wish to distribute any 3rd party
executable that maybe 1% of my users would like.
Does not make sense to do that.
Would be huge downloads! :)
Have you considered an alternative business plan ?
I already now earn my own living from selling my
software. But now and then, people request flash
parsing support. This leaves two choices:
I can either write parser myself
(which I may end up doing)
or
make an option for my software to use
external application if users care enough
to download themselves.
And no, I don't think that is an antisocial concept.
As I even pointed out in my email... That even
if I could use swfmill with GPL license, I would
not do it if the authors of swfmill did not like it.
I really don't get how you can present that
as antisocial.... But whatever :)
best regards
Thomas Schulz
_______________________________________________
swfmill mailing list
swfmill@osflash.org
http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/swfmill_osflash.org
_______________________________________________
swfmill mailing list
swfmill@osflash.org
http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/swfmill_osflash.org
