Hi, David asked for a "quick summary" for the WG. I have prepared a document which is not quick and is not much of a summary. It provides - pointers to the mails where issues were raised, - the originator of the mail, - the main issues, - the action and, - the conclusion. It will be useful if you use this "summary" along with some mail archive tool (the wg archive covers only the last few days, you may try http://www.cysol.co.jp/contrib/syslogmib/threads.html) Please note: a. It covers only discussions related to the MIB, issues related to other documents are not covered. b. It covers the period starting from the WGLC c. The list of main issues for each mail is not exhaustive. The positions of individuals and the pros and cons are not included. Please refer to the original the mail if you are looking for a detailed list. Please let me know if I have missed some threads.
Cheers Glenn David Harrington wrote: > Hi Glenn and Alex, > > Can you provide a quick summary for the WG of the issues that have > been raised regarding the mib document and the sign document since the > beginning of the WGLC (which started 9-11-06 and 8-28-06 > respectively), pointers to the threads where discussions of the issues > were held, the list of names for people who specifically took a > posiiton on the issue, and what you percieve to be the WG consensus on > the issues based on the stated positions? > > As we near the end of the work on these documents, we will need these > summaries for AD review. > > Thanks, > David Harrington > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _______________________________________________ > Syslog mailing list > Syslog@lists.ietf.org > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/syslog
[Syslog] Working Group Last Call: syslog-mib document, David B Harrington Re: [Syslog] Working Group Last Call: syslog-mib document, tom.petch The "subject" of the MIB => "Entity" One or more syslog entities per MIB ? => Multiple entities. RE: [Syslog] MIB document decision, Alexander Clemm (alex) To handle SyslogSign or not. WG polled. No response. => Leave for later ( Separate Document) [Syslog] WGLC results : Syslog-MIB, Glenn M. Keeni [Syslog] RE: Request for Reviewers - draft-ietf-syslog-device-mib-09.txt, Wijnen, Bert (Bert) SMICng errors => Done MIB nits => Done syslog-transport over tls -> discussed => revised [Syslog] Dbh Review of -mib-09, part 1, David Harrington ID-nits Terminology: sender, receiver, relay -> Discussed => Entity SyslogSeverity: "other" -> Discussed syslog-transport -> Discussed => revise syslEntOpsMsgsIgnored: unclear -> Discussed => revise syslEntOpsLastError: unclear -> Discussed => revise syslEntOpsReference: unclear -> Discussed => revise [Syslog] Dbh re-Review of -mib-11, part 1, David Harrington Terminology: sender, receiver, relay -> Discussed => Entity SyslogSeverity: "other" usage ? -> Discussed SyslogService: UDP/TCP ? -> Discussed Descriptive Indices -> Discussed => Use Description MOs syslEntOpsMsgsIgnored: Allowed Specs? -> Discussed syslEntOpsLastError: unclear -> Clarified => revise [Syslog] Dbh re-review of Mib-11-, part 2, David B Harrington transportAddressType/Service unclear -> Discussed syslogEntityControlStorageType -> Discussed => revise notifications: Description unclear -> Discussed => revise notifications: mandatory/optional ? -> Clarified => optional transport security: discuss ? -> Discussed => comment withdrawn [Syslog] -mib-, part 3, David Harrington Add congestion avoidance ? -> No reaction from WG [Syslog] Review of Mib-10, part 1, David Harrington mainly ID, MIB nits => fix [Syslog] Mib -10-, part 2, David Harrington Terminology -> Discussed earlier One or more syslog entities per MIB ? -> Discussed earlier [Syslog] Review of mib-11, part 3, David Harrington Purpose of Default parameters -> Explained [Syslog] Syslog-mib-11, David Harrington One or more syslog entities per MIB ? -> Discussed => multiple entities [Syslog] Syslog-mib-12, David Harrington To WG: Fig1, Terminology Re: [Syslog] Submission of draft-ietf-syslog-device-mib-12.txt, Juergen Schoenwaelder Transport Domain matter -> Discussed => Revise [Syslog] Rfc3164 and mib, David Harrington RFC3164 to be obsoleted => Revise [Syslog] MIB Issue #1 - one or multiple? Seeking consensus, David Harrington One or multiple entity per MIB -> Discussed => Multiple entities [Syslog] MIB Issue #2: document terminology., David Harrington Terminology -> Discussed [Syslog] Mib-13, David Harrington "Entity" unnecessary abstraction -> Explained => Waiting for WG input restructure mib tree => Revise Fig-1 unclear ? Incomplete ? -> Explained MsgsSent ? => Add MO unclear/incomplete Descriptions -> Explained => Revise entity `Re: [Syslog] Mib-13, tom.petch Entity vs application -> Discussed
_______________________________________________ Syslog mailing list Syslog@lists.ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/syslog