Hi,
David asked for a "quick summary" for the WG. I have prepared
a document which is not quick and is not much of a summary.
It provides
- pointers to the mails where issues were raised,
- the originator of the mail,
- the main issues,
- the action and,
- the conclusion.
It will be useful if you use this "summary" along with some mail
archive tool (the wg archive covers only the last few days,
you may try http://www.cysol.co.jp/contrib/syslogmib/threads.html)
Please note:
a. It covers only discussions related to the MIB, issues
related to other documents are not covered.
b. It covers the period starting from the WGLC
c. The list of main issues for each mail is not exhaustive.
The positions of individuals and the pros and cons are not
included.
Please refer to the original the mail if you are looking
for a detailed list.
Please let me know if I have missed some threads.
Cheers
Glenn
David Harrington wrote:
> Hi Glenn and Alex,
>
> Can you provide a quick summary for the WG of the issues that have
> been raised regarding the mib document and the sign document since the
> beginning of the WGLC (which started 9-11-06 and 8-28-06
> respectively), pointers to the threads where discussions of the issues
> were held, the list of names for people who specifically took a
> posiiton on the issue, and what you percieve to be the WG consensus on
> the issues based on the stated positions?
>
> As we near the end of the work on these documents, we will need these
> summaries for AD review.
>
> Thanks,
> David Harrington
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Syslog mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/syslog
[Syslog] Working Group Last Call: syslog-mib document, David B Harrington
Re: [Syslog] Working Group Last Call: syslog-mib document, tom.petch
The "subject" of the MIB => "Entity"
One or more syslog entities per MIB ? => Multiple entities.
RE: [Syslog] MIB document decision, Alexander Clemm (alex)
To handle SyslogSign or not.
WG polled. No response. => Leave for later
( Separate Document)
[Syslog] WGLC results : Syslog-MIB, Glenn M. Keeni
[Syslog] RE: Request for Reviewers - draft-ietf-syslog-device-mib-09.txt,
Wijnen, Bert (Bert)
SMICng errors => Done
MIB nits => Done
syslog-transport over tls -> discussed => revised
[Syslog] Dbh Review of -mib-09, part 1, David Harrington
ID-nits
Terminology: sender, receiver, relay -> Discussed => Entity
SyslogSeverity: "other" -> Discussed
syslog-transport -> Discussed => revise
syslEntOpsMsgsIgnored: unclear -> Discussed => revise
syslEntOpsLastError: unclear -> Discussed => revise
syslEntOpsReference: unclear -> Discussed => revise
[Syslog] Dbh re-Review of -mib-11, part 1, David Harrington
Terminology: sender, receiver, relay -> Discussed => Entity
SyslogSeverity: "other" usage ? -> Discussed
SyslogService: UDP/TCP ? -> Discussed
Descriptive Indices -> Discussed => Use Description MOs
syslEntOpsMsgsIgnored: Allowed Specs? -> Discussed
syslEntOpsLastError: unclear -> Clarified => revise
[Syslog] Dbh re-review of Mib-11-, part 2, David B Harrington
transportAddressType/Service unclear -> Discussed
syslogEntityControlStorageType -> Discussed => revise
notifications: Description unclear -> Discussed => revise
notifications: mandatory/optional ? -> Clarified => optional
transport security: discuss ? -> Discussed => comment withdrawn
[Syslog] -mib-, part 3, David Harrington
Add congestion avoidance ? -> No reaction from WG
[Syslog] Review of Mib-10, part 1, David Harrington
mainly ID, MIB nits => fix
[Syslog] Mib -10-, part 2, David Harrington
Terminology -> Discussed earlier
One or more syslog entities per MIB ? -> Discussed earlier
[Syslog] Review of mib-11, part 3, David Harrington
Purpose of Default parameters -> Explained
[Syslog] Syslog-mib-11, David Harrington
One or more syslog entities per MIB ? -> Discussed => multiple entities
[Syslog] Syslog-mib-12, David Harrington
To WG: Fig1, Terminology
Re: [Syslog] Submission of draft-ietf-syslog-device-mib-12.txt, Juergen
Schoenwaelder
Transport Domain matter -> Discussed => Revise
[Syslog] Rfc3164 and mib, David Harrington
RFC3164 to be obsoleted => Revise
[Syslog] MIB Issue #1 - one or multiple? Seeking consensus, David Harrington
One or multiple entity per MIB -> Discussed => Multiple entities
[Syslog] MIB Issue #2: document terminology., David Harrington
Terminology -> Discussed
[Syslog] Mib-13, David Harrington
"Entity" unnecessary abstraction -> Explained => Waiting for WG input
restructure mib tree => Revise
Fig-1 unclear ? Incomplete ? -> Explained
MsgsSent ? => Add MO
unclear/incomplete Descriptions -> Explained => Revise
entity `Re: [Syslog] Mib-13, tom.petch
Entity vs application -> Discussed
_______________________________________________
Syslog mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/syslog
