Glenn M. Keeni wrote: > tom.petch wrote: >> Glenn >> >> One issue that occurred to me that I do not think has surfaced before is the >> nature of references in the MIB module which must make sense outside the >> wrapper >> of the RFC, so that [RFCUDPX], [RFCTLSX] and [RFCBEEP] won't do. >> . >> Look at how this is handled in, for example, draft-ietf-pwe3-pw-mib-09, >> RFC4273 >> or RFC4750.
draft-ietf-pwe3-pw-mib-09 does not seem to exist on internet-drafts archives or on google. > > Thanks. > > Glenn >> Tom Petch Glenn _______________________________________________ Syslog mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/syslog
