Glenn M. Keeni wrote: > Glenn M. Keeni wrote: >> tom.petch wrote: >>> Glenn >>> >>> One issue that occurred to me that I do not think has surfaced before is the >>> nature of references in the MIB module which must make sense outside the >>> wrapper >>> of the RFC, so that [RFCUDPX], [RFCTLSX] and [RFCBEEP] won't do. >>> . >>> Look at how this is handled in, for example, draft-ietf-pwe3-pw-mib-09, >>> RFC4273 >>> or RFC4750. > > draft-ietf-pwe3-pw-mib-09 does not seem to exist on internet-drafts > archives or on google. OK. I got draft-ietf-pwe3-pw-mib-10.txt
>> Thanks. >> >> Glenn >>> Tom Petch > > Glenn > > > _______________________________________________ > Syslog mailing list > [email protected] > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/syslog _______________________________________________ Syslog mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/syslog
