Oops, I have overlooked that one. I agree with Glenn that this should be
in the charter.

Rainer 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Glenn 
> Mansfield Keeni
> Sent: Thursday, November 24, 2005 11:33 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Syslog] Revised proposed charter
> 
> Chris,
>      You seem to have dropped the last deliverable which is 
> in good shape
> 
> >     - A MIB definition for syslog will be produced.
> 
> I would strongly recommend that we include it. It is an 
> important aspect
> of the protocol. Some effort has gone into it. And it is the least
> controversial [there are no issues of backward compatibility]. And it
> is very close to completion.
> 
> Glenn
> 
> Chris Lonvick wrote:
> > Hi All,
> > 
> > ==== v2 of proposed charter ===
> > 
> > Syslog is a de-facto standard for logging system events.  
> However, the
> > protocol component of this event logging system has not 
> been formally
> > documented.  While the protocol has been very useful and 
> scalable, it
> > has some known security problems which were documented in RFC 3164.
> > 
> > The goal of this working group is to address the security 
> and integrity
> > problems, and to standardize the syslog protocol, transport, and a
> > select set of mechanisms in a manner that considers the ease of
> > migration between and the co-existence of existing versions and the
> > standard.
> > 
> > syslog has traditionally been transported over UDP and this WG has
> > already defined RFC 3195 for the reliable transport for the syslog
> > messages.  The WG will separate the UDP transport from the 
> protocol so
> > that others may define additional transports in the future.
> > 
> > 
> > - A document will be produced that describes a standardized syslog
> > protocol.  A mechanism will also be defined in this document
> > that will provide a means to convey structured data.
> > 
> > - A document will be produced that describes a standardized UDP
> > transport for syslog.
> > 
> > - A document will be produced that describes a standardized 
> mechanism
> > to sign syslog messages to provide integrity checking and source
> > authentication.
> > 
> > 
> > === ===
> > 
> > Comments please.
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Chris
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Syslog mailing list
> > Syslog@lists.ietf.org
> > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/syslog
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Syslog mailing list
> Syslog@lists.ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/syslog
> 

_______________________________________________
Syslog mailing list
Syslog@lists.ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/syslog

Reply via email to