[ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ] > Based on the discussions of the past few days, the one detail that I would add > to the charter is about <PRI> and backward compatability, something along the > lines of > > While compatability with existing syslog systems is desirable, research shows > that these are so diverse that there is nothing in common amongst them apart > from <PRI> so that whilst that field will be retained, other fields may not > be. > > added to the paragraph on syslog protocol.
Why ? The charter shouldn't be mentioning any specifics of the protocol(s) that the group intends to work on. The charter should be as relatively open ended as possible with respect to the actual specifics delivered. Darren _______________________________________________ Syslog mailing list Syslog@lists.ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/syslog
