I vote for a different idea... As in latest syslog-protocol, define only the minimum message size the receivers is required to accept. I vote for defining it in both. Syslog-protocol defines the least common agreed upon denominator. Transport defines the minimum that is appropriate for the transport, which can be higher if needed. Thus, if a receiver implements a syslog protocol and a given transport, it has to meet both requirements.
Anton. > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris > Lonvick (clonvick) > Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2005 2:08 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [Syslog] #2, max message size - Need to resolve this > > Hi Folks, > > We need to resolve this one. I've heard from Rainer and a > very few others. I'd like to hear from more people on this. > Choose one: > > __ The maximum message length needs to be defined in syslog-protocol. > > > __ The maximum message length should be defined in the transport > documents. > > > __ I have a different idea.... > > > Please VOTE NOW! > > Thanks, > Chris > > _______________________________________________ > Syslog mailing list > Syslog@lists.ietf.org > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/syslog > _______________________________________________ Syslog mailing list Syslog@lists.ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/syslog
