For obvious reasons, I agree with Steve and Anton.

Rainer

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steve 
> Chang (schang99)
> Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2005 9:46 PM
> To: Anton Okmianski (aokmians); Chris Lonvick (clonvick); 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [Syslog] #2, max message size - Need to resolve this
> 
> 
> I agree with Anton's wording and view.
> 
> Instead of capping the size maximally that a syslog receiver 
> is to support, it should be the minimum size that it should support.
> 
> Steve
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > On Behalf Of Anton Okmianski (aokmians)
> > Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2005 12:15 PM
> > To: Chris Lonvick (clonvick); [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: RE: [Syslog] #2, max message size - Need to resolve this
> > 
> > I vote for a different idea... As in latest syslog-protocol, define
> only
> > the minimum message size the receivers is required to accept. I vote
> for
> > defining it in both.  Syslog-protocol defines the least 
> common agreed
> upon
> > denominator.  Transport defines the minimum that is appropriate for
> the
> > transport, which can be higher if needed.  Thus, if a receiver
> implements
> > a syslog protocol and a given transport, it has to meet both
> requirements.
> > 
> > Anton.
> > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris Lonvick 
> > > (clonvick)
> > > Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2005 2:08 PM
> > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Subject: [Syslog] #2, max message size - Need to resolve this
> > >
> > > Hi Folks,
> > >
> > > We need to resolve this one.  I've heard from Rainer and 
> a very few 
> > > others.  I'd like to hear from more people on this. Choose one:
> > >
> > > __  The maximum message length needs to be defined in
> syslog-protocol.
> > >
> > >
> > > __  The maximum message length should be defined in the transport
> > >      documents.
> > >
> > >
> > > __  I have a different idea....
> > >
> > >
> > > Please VOTE NOW!
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Chris
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Syslog mailing list
> > > Syslog@lists.ietf.org 
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/syslog
> > >
> > 
> > 
> _______________________________________________
> > Syslog mailing list
> > Syslog@lists.ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/syslog
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Syslog mailing list
> Syslog@lists.ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/syslog
> 

_______________________________________________
Syslog mailing list
Syslog@lists.ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/syslog

Reply via email to