On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 07:34:01PM +0100, Colin Guthrie wrote: > 'Twas brillig, and Vivek Goyal at 30/07/13 15:26 did gyre and gimble: > > On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 02:05:08PM +0200, Tom Gundersen wrote: > >> On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 1:53 PM, WANG Chao <chaow...@redhat.com> wrote: > >>> If specified kernel command line rd.weak_sysroot, fstab-generate will > >>> generate a weaker version of sysroot.mount: > >>> - It's not required by initrd-root-fs.target. > >>> - It's not before initrd-root-fs.target. > >>> > >>> So that failure in the weaker sysroot.mount will not fail > >>> initrd-root-fs.target. And systemd will try continue rather than > >>> entering isolated emergency mode. > >> > >> Can you give an example case where this is useful? I.e., what is the > >> setup and how is boot supposed to succeed with a failing sysroot? > > > > Hi, > > > > Can you please not drop people listed in CC in original thread from > > conversation. > > FYI, I don't see any CC's on the original mail as displayed on GMane via > NNTP...
I am CCed in original mail and that's why I got a copy of it in my Inbox. I am not sure how did Tom receive that mail. If my email id somehow automatically got stripped, I have no idea how that can happen. I am trying to look into systemd-devel archives but there does not seem to be any info who is CCed on the mail. Thanks Vivek _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel