On Mon, 24.03.14 17:37, Michael Biebl (mbi...@gmail.com) wrote: > >> > Hmm, I am not overly hapy with adding even more ifdefs to the > >> > code... i'd rather see less ifdefs... > >> > >> I can rip out the chkconfig parsing completely, if that is what you > >> want. > > > > Nah, we need to keep it in for fedora/rhel I figure, for now. > > So you're saying as long as it benefits Fedora, having ifdefs is fine, > but not for other distros?
No. I mentioned before that I'd be happy to add code that defers to update-rcd on Debian, instead of chkconfig. No problem with that. If Debian has worthwile header extensions I'd parse them too, if they are Okish to support. It's really not about Debian vs. Fedora. The sysv support really should be removed from PID 1 anyway, and be placed in a generator, so that the legacy stuff doesn't pollute PID 1 anymore... But I never found the time to do that... Lennart -- Lennart Poettering, Red Hat _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
