Hi DaveF, Acting on advice, I have already split the Bridleway and re-tagged 2 sections as: bicycle=yesdesignation=public_bridlewayfoot=designatedhighway=stepshorse=designatedincline=down (or up)lit=nosurface=paved
The steps can be seen on aerial imagery (a bit fuzzy on Bing, but particularly clear in the aerial imagery whose name shall not be mentioned in OSM), plus I remember running through there a few months ago, so I know that the steps are there. I intend to visit again soon and add more detail (number of steps, etc.) Between these is a section of the orignal way, which is now https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1277843368 I hope this helps and that you agree with the tagging. Regards,Peter (PeterPan99) On Sunday, 28 April 2024 at 17:35:58 BST, Dave F via Tagging <tagging@openstreetmap.org> wrote: Could you provide the link to the OSM way please? DaveF On 28/04/2024 15:19, Peter Neale via Tagging wrote: Advice, please. A local Public Bridleway has a few (3, 4 or 5 from Aerial imagery) steps going down before it passes under a road bridge, and a similar number up again on the other side. How can I best tag this? According to the wiki, "highway=steps" seems to be *an alternative to*, not *a qualification of * "highway=bridleway". I don't want to mislead consumers by breaking the bridleway, but I don't want cycling consumers to be unaware of the fact that there are a few steps to descend / ascend, which may require a dismount. Regards, Peter (PeterPan99) _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
