Warin,

I agree with your point about being able to tag the turn restrictions, and
the solid white line.

I think the main issue is that the node where the ways diverge is a
significant distance from where the line become solid.  If fact, the node
is near the beginning of the dashed line.

If the divergence of the ways was placed nearer to the commencement of the
solid white line, this would maintain the ability to implement turn
restrictions, and clean up the intersection.  Lane tagging is also
recommended, prior to the divergence of the ways, so that supporting
navigation aids can advise the driver appropriately.

Does this work for you, Petra/Telenav?

Also, Petra, your image of the WA intersection is more in-line with what I
believe should be mapped in that instance, and is in line with my earlier
comments.

Does anyone else have further suggestions on the Canberra intersection?

Regards,

JohnB

On Sat, Jan 12, 2019 at 8:53 AM Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On 11/01/19 19:51, John Berkers wrote:
>
> Long time lurker, some time editor.
>
> It is my understanding that marked "turn right only  lanes" are not cause
> to create divergent ways.  These should be tagged using the "lanes" key as
> per https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:lanes
>
> Creating divergent ways is considered "Tagging for the renderer" as the
> documented separation is not physically there.
>
>
> I disagree. But then I could be wrong.
> In the second (Canberra) example:
> Where a solid line exists between the two groups of lanes there is a
> 'legal barrier' that you cannot legally cross between the two groups of
> lanes (2 go right and 2 continues
>  straight on).
> Using the tag lanes does not convey this 'legal barrier'.
> Also using the tag lanes how can the turn restrictions that exist be
> tagged, the right 2 must turn right and the left 2 must go straight on ?
>
>
> The first one, in WA, appears less of an issue to me.  Perhaps the
> separation nodes could be closer to where the ways actually diverge,
> somewhere around the mid-point of the dashed lines, rather than at the
> start of them.
>
> The second one, near Canberra, has clearly diverged ways most of the way
> along the bridge.
>
> This intersection in Melbourne could potentially serve as an example:
>
> https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/-37.93265/145.15653
>
> Where there are actual medians between lanes, the ways separate,
> otherwise, they do not.
>
> Hope I haven't spoken out of turn.  The views expressed above are my
> understanding of the guidelines with respect to mapping what is actually
> there.
>
> Regards,
>
> JohnB
>
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 6:15 PM Graeme Fitzpatrick <graemefi...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Resend to include list :-(
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Graeme
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------
>> From: Graeme Fitzpatrick <graemefi...@gmail.com>
>> Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2019 at 17:12
>> Subject: Re: [talk-au] Editing road geometry Australia
>> To: Petra Rajka - (p) <petra.ra...@telenav.com>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, 11 Jan 2019 at 16:19, Petra Rajka - (p) <petra.ra...@telenav.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi everyone,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I’m Petra and I am part of the mapping team at Telenav.
>>>
>>> Since January we started to work on road geometry in Canberra, Perth and
>>> Melbourne and we came across some intersections where roads (turn lanes)
>>> are mapped separately even where there is no physical divider or chevron
>>> markings.
>>>
>>
>> Sorry, Petra, but you've got me, at least, a bit confused?
>>
>> https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit#map=20/-32.09137/116.01315 certainly
>> appears to show traffic islands (better view with Esri Clarity)
>>
>> https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit#map=18/-35.34078/149.16289 has marked
>> "turn right only" lanes.
>>
>> Sorry, can't see a problem with either of them, unless you're looking at
>> something I'm not seeing? :-)
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Graeme
>> _______________________________________________
>> Talk-au mailing list
>> Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-au mailing 
> listTalk-au@openstreetmap.orghttps://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-au mailing list
> Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
>
_______________________________________________
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au

Reply via email to