On Tue, 10 Aug 2010 10:56:28 +0200, Ivo De Broeck <ivo.debro...@gmail.com> wrote: > What i propose is keeping the existing relation for the "normal" > direction.
There is no "normal" direction with buses. > Example stadsbus nr 8 go from Bertem - Leuven - Bierbeek (check the > relation with the relation checker). Give the same relationnumber to > all bus-stops for that direction. You mean: add the stops to the relation. > If you are in Leuven you can choose the bus 8 to Bierbeek (relation > one) OR bus 8 to Bertem (relation 2). And there comes the part for the "from" and "to" tags in the relation which I thought had no use. You always "take line X towards Y". And having the from and to in the relation will specify Y. Oh, and <http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Oxomoa/Public_transport_schema> has a more elaborate tagging scheme. Regards, Maarten > 2010/8/10 Renaud MICHEL > Le mardi 10 août 2010 à 10:22, Tim Francois a écrit : > >> +1. Yup, this is what is currently happening in most of the UK - a > > separate relation for the 'up' and 'down' bus routes, so that > > forwards/backwards (which is kinda broken as a concept in this > case) > > is not required! > > I'm interested, for now I have created single relation for a bus > route in > Liège. > How should I tag the two separate relations? > > The page > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Buses [2] > doesn't talk about double relation, but suggests that bus_stop > should be put > on the way, but the bus stops are not on the road but along it. > > -- > Renaud Michel > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-be mailing list > Talk-be@openstreetmap.org [3] > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be [4] _______________________________________________ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be