That is indeed great news! Does it mean we'll be able to use the building
outlines/contours as well then, in the foreseeable future? And, if so,
would they be available as vectors/shape files, like in the UrbIS dataset?
Or am I mistaken and is that in CRAB and not in GRB?

Jo

2015-01-05 12:03 GMT+01:00 Glenn Plas <gl...@byte-consult.be>:

> Thanks Jan for keeping us in the loop.  This is awesome news.
>
> Glenn
>
>
>
> On 05-01-15 11:08, Jan Laporte wrote:
> > GRB currently is in the process of becoming open data. The agreement is
> > signed and official. Only the GRB-decree needs to be edited now before
> > it effectively is open data. I can unfortunately not give a timing for
> that.
> >
> >
> >
> > In any case, it’ll be allowed quite soon.
> >
> >
> >
> > cheers
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > *From:*André Pirard [mailto:a.pirard.pa...@gmail.com]
> > *Sent:* donderdag 1 januari 2015 17:49
> > *To:* OpenStreetMap Belgium
> > *Subject:* Re: [OSM-talk-be] WMS (aerial) imagery covering Belgium, now
> > conveniently packaged for adding it to JOSM
> >
> >
> >
> > On 2015-01-01 16:19, Glenn Plas wrote :
> >
> >     The danger in not adding GRB layer is that people will 'correct'
> using
> >
> >     Bing, and we all know where that leads to...
> >
> >
> >
> >     We should focus on efforts in getting GRB to open up.  I'm terribly
> >
> >     frustrated by people deleting buildings using Bing while I have added
> >
> >     all new buildings using Agiv, doublechecked using GRB and addressed
> >
> >     properly only to find out that the get deleted by some oblivious
> user.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-be mailing list
> Talk-be@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
>
_______________________________________________
Talk-be mailing list
Talk-be@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be

Reply via email to