On 5 May 2011 17:03, Nick Whitelegg <nick.whitel...@solent.ac.uk> wrote:
> > >Thanks for the suggestion. Take a look at this one which I hope does > roughly what you have asked for with the >exception that I have coloured > 'other designations' with a off-yellow (as used for unrecognised values in > other map >views) and I have added grey for paths with no designation. Grey > paths include highway=path, footway, bridleway, >cycleway and byway. There > is a key this time. > >http://www.itoworld.com/product/data/ito_map/main?view=87<http://www.itoworld.com/product/data/ito_map/main?view=87> > > Interesting... seems to show that us Hampshire mappers, along with those in > Cheshire, are the most zealous designators. > There are certainly some prolific designators in some places! My patch is particularly poor I am sorry to say. Not sure how widespread this is but I tag byways as > designation=public_byway. Might be good to show these too. > Can do. Is this a separate value/colour or is it an alias for another value? If it is a separate colour then what colour would you suggest? Regards, Peter > Nick > >
_______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
