Nice! I better start adding marikina boundaries then (well until we agree on the proposal)
cheers, maning still at work! midway to finishing the image processing. > For example, see this relation for Brgy. Urdaneta in Makati: > http://openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/103686 > > Or this relation for Brgy. Ayala Alabang: > http://openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/110365 > > > Eugene / seav > > > On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 8:16 PM, maning sambale > <emmanuel.samb...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> Sounds like a good proposal to me. Do we vote? :) >> Let's wait for the others to look into it before we start >> implementing. I'm not really sure what is the extent of coverage of >> existing admin boundary data that we need to edit to follow this >> convention. >> >> Next question would be, will it be a relation or just regular node/way? >> >> cheers, >> maning >> >> who wants to go home already but still working because he needs to >> finish statistical processing of gigabytes of satellite data to meet >> work deadline! >> >> On 4/30/09, Eugene Alvin Villar <sea...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > Hi maning, >> > >> > Actually, I mentioned in my e-mail that I have specifically excluded >> > congressional districts[1] from the discussion since these do not >> > specify >> > administrative boundaries. Aside from the pork barrel, the >> representatives >> > don't *administer* their territories. I think these should be tagged as >> > boundary=legislative/congressional and not as >> boundary=administrative.[2] >> > >> > I've done a bit more research since my initial e-mail and here is my >> > proposed values for admin_level: >> > >> > 2 - National border >> > 3 - Regions >> > 4 - Provinces >> > 5 - Sangguniang Panlalawigan districts (if any) >> > 6 - Cities/Municipalities >> > 7 - Sangguniang Panlungsod/Bayan districts (if any) >> > 8 - Other administrative districts[3] (if any) >> > 9 - Zones (if any) >> > 10 - Barangays >> > 12 - Sitios/Puroks (if any, but only if boundaries are defined) >> > >> > The Sangguniang Lalawigan/Lungsod/Bayan districts are mentioned in >> Republic >> > Act No. 7887[4]. These districts basically apportion the members of the >> > LGU's Sanggunian. Since the Sanggunian is an administrative entity >> > (it's >> > the >> > one that creates the local laws or ordinances), then it's proper that >> their >> > districts also be given admin_levels. >> > >> > These proposed values have the proviso that admin_level=3 is *not* >> > automatically an admin_level=4|5 due to the weird nature of Isabela >> > City >> > and >> > the ARMM. (But, as long as all boundaries are grouped into relations, >> then >> > there should be no problem with interpretations.) >> > >> > >> > Eugene / seav >> > >> > ------------- >> > [1] The proper legal term is "legislative district". >> > >> > [2] We can also have boundary=judicial (for the jurisdictions of the >> > Regional and Metropolitan trial courts) and boundary=police (like >> Manila's >> > Western Police District). Also, Catholic archdioceses and dioceses, >> anyone >> > (boundary=catholic)? :-) >> > >> > [3] Examples of other non-Sanggunian districts: >> > >> > A. Manila has 6 Sangguniang districts (I to VI) co-terminous with the >> > legislative districts and these are further subdivided into 17 >> geographical >> > districts: Tondo 1, Tondo 2, Sta. Cruz, Sampaloc, Sta. Mesa, Quiapo, >> > Binondo, San Miguel, San Nicolas, Port Area, Intramuros, Paco, >> > Pandacan, >> > Ermita, Malate, Sta. Ana, and San Andres. These districts are further >> > subdivided into 100 zones. (Tondo 1 and Tondo 2 used to be one >> > district, >> > while San Andres used to be part of Sta. Ana and Sta. Mesa used to be >> part >> > of Sampaloc.) >> > >> > B. Iloilo City has 6 districts: Arevalo, City Proper, Jaro, La Paz, >> > Mandurriao, and Molo. (Iloilo City has only 1 legislative district.) >> > >> > C. Davao City has 3 Sangguniang districts (1 to 3) co-terminous with >> > the >> > legislative districts and these are further subdivided into 11 >> > administrative districts: Poblacion, Talomo, Agdao, Buhangin, Bunawan, >> > Paquibato, Baguio, Calinan, Marilog, Toril, and Tugbok. >> > >> > D. Pasay City has 7 districts (1 to 7) subdivided into 20 zones. (Pasay >> > City >> > has only 1 legislative district.) >> > >> > N.B. Quezon City "districts" like Cubao, Diliman, La Loma, San >> > Francisco >> > del >> > Monte, Projects 2,3,4,5,6,7,8, etc. DO NOT have legally defined borders >> so >> > they won't have a place in the admin_level scheme. >> > >> > [4] http://www.chanrobles.com/republicacts/republicactno7887.html >> > >> > >> > > > -- > http://vaes9.codedgraphic.com > -- cheers, maning ------------------------------------------------------ "Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden wiki: http://esambale.wikispaces.com/ blog: http://epsg4253.wordpress.com/ ------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ talk-ph mailing list talk-ph@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph
