On Wed, Mar 13, 2019, 10:17 Max Erickson <maxerick...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The compartments likely aren't the right data for a general purpose > map; I'm not entirely sure, but they seem to be the basic management > unit for state forest land, so when they consider a cut or whatever > they consider it for that area. For OSM, the right things is probably > to have individual objects for each state forest, game area, park, > etc. > > Complicating things, the state seems to have moved away from saying > much about the top level state forests. But I think they are probably > still the right thing for a general purpose map. > Right. That's why I was talking about coalescing compartments that have the same management type and name. The table in my earlier message shows the number of compartments to be combined for each facility.
_______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us