I believe that there's some boundary rendering bugs that are yet to be fixed in mapnik, I've not seen this one before.
As a side issue, does the county boundary really go up the river like that or just cut across the mouth? I think we need to review this. I recall talking to steve8 who did the boundary relation for the southwest counties that he'd just added the coastline to the relation, and not considered river mouths. I'll look into the data myself if I get the time. 2009/3/2 Kevin Peat <ke...@kevinpeat.com>: > I made some changes a couple of weeks ago to the banks of the River Dart > through Totnes > > http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=50.42863&lon=-3.67974&zoom=15&layers=B000FFF > > Obviously those changes have been picked up as the county boundary is > rendering along the updated river bank but the actual river isn't. > > Is this just a time lag thing or have I done something wrong? > > On the subject of UK county boundaries it's nice to see them rendering > (in Mapnik) but it seems a bit odd for the boundaries to be rendered > around coastlines and up river estuaries. Is it possible to only render > the inland parts ie. where the ways are not tagged as natural=coastline? > > thanks, > Kevin > > _______________________________________________ > talk mailing list > talk@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk > -- Regards, Thomas Wood (Edgemaster) _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
