On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 11:35 AM, Frederik Ramm <frede...@remote.org> wrote: > Hi, > > Andy Allan wrote: >> >> 1) Make the plan and the draft public. Ask for feedback. >> 2) Wait for feedback to be taken into account and expect/hope for a >> final version of the ODbL >> 3) See if the OSMF board approves >> 4) See if OSMF members like what results > > The word "final" should probably be struck out here because it has kind of > "gun to your head" ring to it: Take this license or be stuck with CC-BY-SA > forever. > > Instead, if either the OSMF board, or the members, are unhappy with the > license (which is quite likely given that only ONE week is scheduled for > phase 2 and I can safely say that the status quo would not pass a vote), > then we need a new iteration; what is your "final" version then becomes the > draft, and back to phase 1. > > And this must be made clear when the vote is taken; that this is not a vote > about "ODbL now or CC-BY-SA forever" but a vote about "ODbL or wait for > revisions".
Absolutely. I meant final as in non-draft - bad choice of words on my behalf. Like saying when we have a "final" version of API 0.6 ;-) Cheers, Andy _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
