Heiko Jacobs schrieb: > Hello > > For some sorts of cycleroads you may look at my images at > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Bycicle/overview_ways#Fahrradstra.C3.9Fe > > first image: > cycleroad, no separate tracks fpr pedestrians, motor_vehicle=yes > cycleway=street footway=both parking:left=inline motor_vehicle=yes width=6 > second image: > the same with separate tracks for pedestrians, former residential > cycleway=street footway=both motor_vehicle=yes parking=no halting=no width=10 > third image: > the same street, but now motor_vehicles=no! > cycleway=street footway=both motor_vehicle=no width=10
> all examples are tagged as highway=cycleway up to now, but that's looks > not very fine, especially at Mapnik... > Because it's not only a way (small), but a complete road (esp. im. 2 and 3) > > So tuning the Osmarender style files I also supported rendering > of cycleroads some months ago: > > For "pedestrian designation" we have this order inside OSM: > > 1. highway=residential > no special designation for pedestrian, they have to use tracks/lanes > at the sides or, if not there, the roadway(? Fahrbahn in deutsch) > and have to obey the vehicles > Osmarender renders as: white solid core, wide, grey solid casing > > 2. higway=living_street > designated for pedestrian, but vehicles are allowed with > "pedestrian speed" > Osmarender renders as: white-pink (foot color) dashed, wide, grey solid cas. > > 3. highway=pedestrian > designeted for pedestrian, vehicles only for delivery at some times, > sometimes bicycle=yes, typically former complete roads, redisgnated > Osmarender renders as: "foot color" solid core, wide, grey solid casing > > 4. highway=footway > designated for pedestrian, vehicles normally only for service > (street cleaning...) > Osmarender renders as: "foot color" solid core, small, grey dashed casing > > 5. highway=path > ... > Osmarender renders as: "grey core, small, grey dashed casing > > > This schema I adapted for bicycles inside Osmarender rules: > > 1. highway=residential > no special designation for bicycles, they have to use designated > tracks/lanes at the sides or, if not there, the roadway(? Fahrbahn > in deutsch) > Osmarender renders as: white solid core, wide, grey solid casing > > 2. higway=cycleroad motor_vehicles|motorcar=yes > designated for bicycles, but motor vehicles are allowed with > "bicycle speed" > Osmarender renders as: "bicycle color" dashed, wide, grey solid cas. > > 3. highway=cycleroad (other cases than m...=yes) > designeted for bicycles, normally not for motor vehicles > (besides service?), typically former complete roads, redisgnated > Osmarender renders as: "bicycle color" solid core, wide, grey solid casing > > 4. highway=cycleway > designated for bicycle, motor vehicles normally only for service > (street cleaning...) > Osmarender renders as: "bicycle color" solid core, small, grey dashed casing > > 5. highway=path > ... > Osmarender renders as: "grey core, small, grey dashed casing > > > So Osmarender is prepared to render cycleroad. > > I just don't have a testing environment for Mapnik, so I yet couldn't > prepare rendering of cycleroads in Mapnik... > Because of different styles (cycleway/footway as dashed line instead > of core/casing, living_street uses a strange style not suitable for > this type of road, access-rendering uses styles that Osmarender uses > similar for living_streets) it might be a problem to find proper > solutions for rendering 1. to 5. for foot and bicycle more pleasant > > > highway=cycleroad is the tagging most suitable to the existing > tagging scheme ath this end of highways (residential-living_street- > pedestrian-footway-path) so I vote for this. > > cycleway is not suitable to the appearance of most cycleroads in real live > > residential is not suitable to the designation of cycleroads (and > living_street and pedestrian as also often former roads) > > MfG Heiko Jacobs Z! IRCnet Mueck > If the renderer would use cycleway=street, it would be the same result in the maps ;) Regards Mario _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
