On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 11:45 PM, Roy Wallace<waldo000...@gmail.com> wrote: > You seem to be implying that increasing the amount of data in OSM is a > bad thing???
If it is millions time the same thing, yes. Look another thread speaking about TIGER import clean-up. > Of course, llama access restrictions probably aren't a top priority, > but it IS a GOOD THING to have llama restrictions in the database. Yes, it is. In PERU. > The core issue here (that I believe we agree on) is that if tags have > inconsistent implications, they must be made explicit. Absolutely true: explicit in the wiki ;-) Pieren _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
