John F. Eldredge wrote: > The GPS in my car is a Garmin (I don't recall the exact model at the moment). > It appears to be much more accurate when the car is in motion than when the > car is stationary. If I power the GPS up with the car stationary, the > location given can be inaccurate by 100 meters or more. Once the car starts > to move, the GPS can locate the car within 3 or 4 meters. > > In automotive applications, GPS Units often use a 'snap to road' that makes them look a lot more accurate.
My eTrex Vista HCX has two modes of computing headings: one of them is to (i) look at the direction your track is going in and the other is a (ii) built-in magnetic compass. If I'm moving, either in a vehicle or on foot, I find (i) more satisfying than (ii). The most obnoxious thing about altitude on my eTrex is that I don't see how to get it to use GPS altitude instead of barometric altitude. (I know how to pop up a dialog box to ~view~ GPS altitude, but that's it.) Barometric altitude is totally useless if you're inside a pressurized airplane. ;-) In most situations repeatability is pretty good for me; I use tracks for "breadcrumb navigation" all of the time on foot and rarely see anomalies that cause practical problems. I circumnavigated the BWI airport during a layover the other day and got at the the terminal within 3 minutes of when I thought I would, using GPS data as the major input to my mental calculation. Now, I did get lost in the tunnels of the Library of Congress the day before that... I just need an inertial guidance system for situations like that. _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk