On 10 Nov 2009, at 11:36, Peter Childs wrote: > While the map "quaility" may have some weight as to why people use > Google (or Bing for that matter) I suspect the bigger problem is the > User Interface. > > We have a good UI for map making maps but the API for rending and > searching the maps is hmm well complicated. > > Part of the problem stems from there being so many different ways to > do everything, > > I can't really say Google is any better at this really, but at least > its well documented and everything is in one place.
Fyi, I have just had a response from Campaign for Better Transport. There are two reasons why they are not using OSM at present: 1) There is only partial building coverage which is confusing - they would prefer full or none but not partial. I will do a post to talk-gb to see if someone fancies doing some tracing in the area over the next week. 2) The tube and railway symbols are not the normal ones used within the UK. I will suggest that the overlay the normal UK symbols on the map in some editing software. The above does however show the level of quality and completeness that will be required to win people over, aside from any usability issues and doubts over licensing and attribution. Regards, Peter > > Peter. > > _______________________________________________ > talk mailing list > talk@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
