On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 2:03 AM, Anthony <o...@inbox.org> wrote: > which I don't see as a bridge. I could go with tunnel=yes on the "ditch", > but it's really not a ditch at all at the point it passes under the road.
Before the road: waterway=drain, barrier=ditch Under the road: waterway=drain, tunnel=yes > Honestly, I don't see how the road situation isn't a case of > barrier=entrance. The ditch stops for a little bit where the road crosses > it. Under the road is not a ditch, but a drainpipe. barrier=entrance + > drainpipe=yes? Depends how important the water is. Using barrier=entrance you're basically saying "there's a ditch on the left, and a ditch on the right, but there's a gap between them that you can drive through". Using "waterway=drain tunnel=yes", you're saying "there was water flowing through an open ditch on the left, then it went into a tunnel under the road, now it's flowing through an open ditch on the right". Your call. > That's mapped as a junction, not a bridge (barrier=wall, bridge=yes?), and > it's pretty much the same thing (only, underground instead of over ground). > > barrier=drainpipe (as an "access node"), access=yes? Oh, I've finally understood..oops. You want to map this as a node, not a way. Maybe barrier=culvert is appropriate after all...but it's kind of gross. Steve _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
