Hi, On 03.05.2013 23:18, andrzej zaborowski wrote:
I don't understand -- wasn't the entire process based on the assumption that intellectual property persists as long as the object ID persists?
No, that is a misconception. During the license change we deviated from that idea in both directions:
* some objects whose ID had not changed and who had been created by someone who rejected the license were nonetheless kept if it could be shown that they had been changed in a major way since;
* some objects that had been freshly created by people agreeing with the license change, but that were more or less copies of other objects from non-agreers, were removed even though they had a different ID.
I will not discuss this sub-thread further; object IDs are not stable and nothing we did during the license change is suitable as a counter argument.
Bye Frederik -- Frederik Ramm ## eMail frede...@remote.org ## N49°00'09" E008°23'33" _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
