On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 12:51 AM, Tobias Knerr <o...@tobias-knerr.de> wrote:
> On 25.02.2015 02:58, Bryce Nesbitt wrote: > > It is apparent that a number of imports have left tens of thousands of > > fixme notes that have a low chance of ever getting addressed. Pick your > > favorite from the lists above: set␣better␣denotation is my mine. > > That's from a mechanical edit that should never have happened in the > first place. The edit was basically done in order to establish the > "denotation" tag for trees, which was almost nonexistent before. > > The denotation values were not pulled from an external source, but based > on guesses of the kind "another tree within x meters => must be a > cluster of trees". In my opinion, it could make sense to also remove the > denotation keys on trees with set␣better␣denotation. After all, the > continuing existence of that fixme shows that no human ever verified these. > > I also agree with the general goal to get rid of pointless fixme values. I've sent a message to the user, to open a discussion about mechanically reversing: fixme=set␣better␣denotation denotation=cluster Because these tags are scattered all over Europe, they are likely to eat mapper time during routine editing and fixme cleanup. The same tag appears on a limited number of "seamarks" http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2456524071
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
