Please, PLEASE, stick to the case. The case is: 1) there are two hillforts, let's call them Hillfort 1 and Hillfort 2 for simplicity. 2) both have big information tables on the ground, with their names on them 3) so they are named Hillfort 1 and Hillfort 2 in OSM and nobody objects that. 4) both have their articles on Wikipedia. The articles may be a little mixed up, but they are articles on Hillfort 1 and Hillfort 2
Why, in this case is it better to have Wikipedia links in OSM point to disambiguation page instead of link Hillfort 1 in OSM to Hillfort 1 in Wikipedia, link Hillfort 2 accordingly and fix Wikipedia doubts in Wikipedia? On 23 October 2017 at 13:33, Andy Townsend <ajt1...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 23/10/2017 11:40, Ryszard Mikke wrote: > >> That seems like a problem to fix in Wikipedia >> > > Part of the problem is that some of these problems simply aren't fixable > at wikipedia. For example https://sr.wikipedia.org/wiki/ > %D0%A1%D1%80%D0%B1%D0%B8%D1%98%D0%B0 and https://sq.wikipedia.org/wiki/ > Serbia are allegedly the same article and https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/ > Q403 lists them both. However, as can be seen by looking at the maps on > each page, they aren't the same geographic entity - one includes Kosovo, > one does not. Neither is "wrong" from the point of view of the authors of > each page yet they can't both be "correct" at the same time. > > Best Regards, > Andy > > > > _______________________________________________ > talk mailing list > talk@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk > -- -- http://tnij.com/WyszukiwarkaRowerowa http://jolanta.korwin-mikke.pl/ r.mi...@pl.vwfsag.de ryszard.mi...@gmail.com دراجة أكبر
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk