As a way why not but not as en area. There is same comportment on barrier=bollard with a succession of bollard crossing a way. You need intersect barrier with highway to perform good tracking and set access (foot=yes and/or not bicycle=yes) barrier=* are implicitly no access for all trip type.
Le jeu. 16 août 2018 à 19:43, Tobias Knerr <o...@tobias-knerr.de> a écrit : > On 15.08.2018 20:49, Tomasz Wójcik wrote: > > Currently, barrier=block is not allowed to be mapped as an area. As > > blocks can be big enough to map them as areas, I think it should be > > allowed, the same as in barrier=wall or barrier=hedge. > > For routing purposes, barriers are usually connected to the highway=* > way somehow. When barriers are mapped as nodes, this is achieved by > tagging one of the way's nodes with the barrier tags. > > How would we do this for barrier=block mapped as areas? > > Note that the block(s) will not always be exactly on the centerline of > the highway, so we may not be able to even share a node between the area > outline and the highway way if we want to accurately represent the area > covered by the block. Due to this, I see no easy solution to map blocks > as areas while still making them topologically part of the routing network. > > _______________________________________________ > talk mailing list > talk@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
