> G'day Jay,

> On Thursday, June 17, 2010, at 3:49:10 PM, you (Jay Walker) wrote:

JW>> 2010/6/14 Ian A. White <r...@thebat.net>:
>>> So I take it that The Bat! is going to move to a subscription model?

JW>> Ian, it doesn't strike me as much of a move. For just about all
JW>> practical purposes, TB licensing has been a subscription model since
JW>> v2.0. :)

> It isn't really, just that maybe it needed to be said.

> RITLabs are being up front about this, however there can be twists and
> turns. I might be a touch jaded as a lot of the software I use that 
> went to a subscription model started out OK, but then some of the 
> turns saw it become nothing more than a revenue raiser. Originally 
> there was the promise of upgrades during the currency of a 
> subscription, only all that went out the window when it became annual 
> new version releases. This meant there were no upgrades at all. There 
> was the promise of support, only no support was offered. It had to be 
> provided by dealers under a separate commercial arrangement. Then it 
> moved to a retirement policy where if you had not upgraded for more 
> than 3 new releases, you had to re-buy. The licence went from being a 
> perpetual licence that had to be refreshed every 3 years, and once 
> retired, they were reluctant to refresh it for another 3 years - never
> mind about upgrades.

> So, you can see, the road to subscriptions can be quite rocky. It 
> gives the software vendor a somewhat better revenue stream (no issues 
> with that), however it does also demand more of them.

> So, no real issues, just that some can have issues with it.

That sounds like Quicken ...

-- 
Rick
You're only young once; you can be immature forever

v4.2.36.4 on Windows XP 5.1 Build  2600
Service Pack 3

 


________________________________________________________
 Current beta is 4.2.33.9 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Reply via email to