Corrections to the table:

 

Entry Score Part 

N     N     N     Do nothing

N     N     Y     %2K+1+1 or %2Ki1+1+1

N     Y     N     %%, Ki2+1+1

N     Y     Y     Ki2+1+1 (=>K1+1+1)

Y     N     N     %%, Ki2-1-1, %2Ki1-1-1

Y     N     Y     %%, Ki2-1-1, %2Ki1+0+1

Y     Y     N     %%, Ki2+0+1, %2Ki1-1-1

Y     Y     Y     Ki2+0+1 (=>K1+0+1)

 

 

From: tex-music-boun...@tug.org [mailto:tex-music-boun...@tug.org] On Behalf
Of Don Simons
Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2011 11:12 PM
To: 'Werner Icking Music Archive'
Subject: Re: [Tex-music] PMX news: Instrument-wise transposition

 

Reverse transposition lives!

 

Before addressing any MIDI issues, let me ask for comments on my feeling
that with a slight modification, the existing code and scor2prt can address
all possible combinations of instrument-wise transposition on entry, in the
score, or in parts. The keys are to recognize that Ki. can act as an
instrument-wise key signature command without any transposition, and also
that reverse transposition is possible.

 

Let's suppose the concert key is F and all instruments except #2 are left
alone, but #2 may be transposed up a step (to G) on entry, or as printed in
the score, or as printed in the part, or any combination of those. The
modification proposed is that commands Ki[iinst][+/-...] will automagically
be transferred to part iinst as K[+/-...] (unless of course the preceding
line is "%%"). Here are all the combinations and the commands that would be
needed just after the usual setup in the score:

 

Entry Score Part 

N     N     N     Do nothing

N     N     Y     %2K+1+1 or %2Ki1+1+1

N     Y     N     %%, Ki2+1+1

N     Y     Y     Ki2+1+1 (=>K1+1+1)

Y     N     N     %%, Ki2-1-1, %2Ki1-1+0

Y     N     Y     %%, Ki2-1+0, %2Ki1+0+1

Y     Y     N     %%, Ki2+0+1, %2Ki1-1+0

Y     Y     Y     Ki2+0+1 (=>K1+0+1)

 

Notes:

1. Y or N is whether the respective aspect (entry, score, part) is
transposed or not for instrument #2.

2. The items in parentheses would appear in part 2 automagically

3. commas in the table mean "start a new line"

 

Some of the combinations are pretty unlikely, e.g. YNN, but still possible.

 

The code modification isn't really necessary; even without it you could do
NYY and YYY with part-only and score-only commands like the others.

 

If this all makes sense, then I can move on to worrying about the MIDI
output. 

 

--Don

-------------------------------
TeX-music@tug.org mailing list
If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to 
http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music

Reply via email to