I have the exact same configuration but I do not do session replication because of the fact that our app was not written correctly (something about serializing variables and ours are not serialized; it will take a code audit and rewrite to accomplish it).
Anyway, here is what you can do: http://www.theserverside.com/resources/article.jsp?l=Tomcat Tomcat 5, now in development, will have session replication across Tomcats (i.e., clustering) built-in. I will say that Mr. Moliere makes a good point: sending session data across the network unencrypted is a rather large security hole. But then again, the communication between mod_jk and Tomcat is by default unencrypted. Ben Ricker Wellinx, inc. On Tue, 2003-08-26 at 09:39, Peter Anning wrote: > Hi, > > I am trying to implement the following configuration: > > > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > Cisco Load Balancer > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > | > | (http) > | > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > Apache A Apache B Apache Cluster Layer > mod_jk mod_jk > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > | > | (ajp13) > | > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > TomcatI.myhost.com TomcatII.myhost.com JBoss Cluster Layer > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > > I can configure mod_jk in each of the Apache instances to > know about the two tomcat instances. So loadbalancing and > failover would work with one instance of apache. > > Is there any way to have the Apache ``cluster'' layer > know about other ``members'' in the layer and the > current servlet connection status? > > Rgds > Peter > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
