Well, you can always ask for your money back.
But I note that per the Tomcat intro, "... Tomcat is the official Reference
Implementation ..."
A reference implementation has never been intended as a production version,
but rather a version from which a lot of learning can be had - both for
developers and users. See some W3C discussion on this topic.
Yep, there's a lot of natural enthusiasm here. But that doesn't change the
nature of the beast, and it sounds like you've made a bad choice for your
environment. A shame, really, but hardly the fault of the Tomcat crew, IMO.
Arnold Shore
Annapolis, MD USA
-----Original Message-----
From: Nick Stoianov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2001 4:54 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: TOMCAT SUCKS
Hi guys,
I really think that TOMCAT SUCKS so bad. I'm not against the open source
community but this is why I think that TOMCAT sucks:
1. The documentation for Tomcat is so bad and it covers only the basic
server installation. HELLOOOO - usually for production purposes people have
load balancers, virtual hosts, etc.
2. Virtual hosting for Tomcat is almost impossible - especially if you have
a
load balancer in front of the web server.
3. The integration with apache (using mod_jk) sucks. It slows down the
productivity of the web server with at least 1000%
4. And guess what is the hell you have to go through if your virtual hosts
have different servlets mappings. You waste time and you know - time is
money.
5. And what if you have a problem that is not in the documentation (99% of
the problem with Tomcat are not even mentioned in the documentation)? I
guess
the only way is to post in the mailing list. And guess what happens if
nobody
has experienced this problem before? You have to start wasting your time
again.
I really think that TOMCAT is OK for testing purposes. Trust me - for
complex
configurations it sucks.
If you want to use a good production application server - take a look at
WebLogic, Resin, Allaire JRun, etc.
Nick
