On Wed, 27 Jun 2001, Arnold Shore wrote: > Well, you can always ask for your money back. > > But I note that per the Tomcat intro, "... Tomcat is the official > Reference Implementation ..." > > A reference implementation has never been intended as a production > version, but rather a version from which a lot of learning can be > had - both for developers and users. See some W3C discussion on > this topic. [ ... ] FWIW, even though Tomcat is the reference implementation of the servlet spec, I think the intention is to have it be production quality. That kinds of makes sense, it being part of Apache. Milt Epstein Research Programmer Software/Systems Development Group Computing and Communications Services Office (CCSO) University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (UIUC) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: TOMCAT SUCKS Nick Stoianov
- So what *IS* available? <Formerly Tomca... howler
- RE: TOMCAT SUCKS Todd D. VanderVeen
- Re: TOMCAT SUCKS Dmitri Colebatch
- FIRST POST - Servlet installation problem Clifford P. Helsel
- Re: FIRST POST - Servlet installation prob... Peter Davison
- RE: FIRST POST - Servlet installation prob... Clifford P. Helsel
- Re: TOMCAT SUCKS Dmitri Colebatch
- Re: TOMCAT SUCKS kevin ritter
- RE: TOMCAT SUCKS Arnold Shore
- AW: TOMCAT SUCKS // what lb problem? plz clari... Milt Epstein
- AW: TOMCAT SUCKS // what lb problem? plz clarify Nico Wieland
- Re: TOMCAT SUCKS Peter Mutsaers
- RE: JRUN really SUCKS (was TOMCAT SUCKS) Arnold Shore
- doclet extension msew
- Re: doclet extension Dmitri Colebatch
- RE: JRUN really SUCKS (was TOMCAT SUCKS) Frans Thamura
- tomcat book Dmitri Colebatch
- Re: Tomcat won't start with j2sdk 1.3.1 & Linux pete