It was a remain in my testcase. I figured out it was the wrong way to go when I ran into getting different xpaths finding my root through 'DocumentRoot' and just loading an xml-instance.
/Chr -----Original Message----- From: Yang ZHONG [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 26. marts 2007 19:19 To: tuscany-user@ws.apache.org Subject: Re: SDO Java M3 Release Candidate RC1 Christian, On the other hand, "DocumentRoot" has no support from the spec. XMLDocument serves some "document" features such as NoNamespaceSchemaLocation, SchemaLocation and RootElement, if some of them are what you're looking for. On 3/26/07, Frank Budinsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > You need to get your DataFactory from the HelperContext: > > DataObject documentDataObject = hc.getDataFactory().create(namespace, > "DocumentRoot"); > > You should generally stop using INSTANCE fields in all cases, because they > are probably going to be deprecated in the next version of SDO. > HelperContext is the replacement. It defines a metadata scope, so you > should always use it to get the helpers for your scope. > > Frank. > > "Christian Landbo Frederiksen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote on 03/26/2007 01:01:00 PM: > > > > > In M2 & M3 this works for a specific schema: > > > > XSDHelper.INSTANCE.define(new String(xsdFile.getBytes("UTF-8"))); > > DataObject documentDataObject = DataFactory.INSTANCE.create(namespace, > > "DocumentRoot"); > > > > But this doesn't > > > > HelperContext hc = SDOUtil.createHelperContext(true); > > hc.getXSDHelper().define(new String(xsdFile.getBytes("UTF-8"))); > > > > DataObject documentDataObject = DataFactory.INSTANCE.create(namespace, > > "DocumentRoot"); > > > > > > java.lang.IllegalArgumentException > > at > > org.apache.tuscany.sdo.helper.DataFactoryImpl.create(DataFactoryImpl.jav > > a:63) > > at > > org.apache.tuscany.sdo.helper.DataFactoryImpl.create(DataFactoryImpl.jav > > a:46) > > at > > sandbox.TestTypeChangesAndExtensibleNamespaces.generate(TestTypeChangesA > > ndExtensibleNamespaces.java:153) > > at > > sandbox.TestTypeChangesAndExtensibleNamespaces.main(TestTypeChangesAndEx > > tensibleNamespaces.java:77) > > > > > > Any ideas? > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Frank Budinsky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: 22. marts 2007 13:38 > > To: tuscany-user@ws.apache.org > > Subject: RE: SDO Java M3 Release Candidate RC1 > > > > Sorry, there's not much documentation, just the JavaDoc. You need to get > > a > > HelperContext by calling SDOUtil.createHelperContext() and then get your > > > > XSDHelper from it. > > > > If you want the new extensible namespaces behavior you need to pass > > "true" > > to createHelperContext: > > > > HelperContext hc = SDOUtil.createHelperContext(true); > > > > Frank. > > > > > > > > > > "Christian Landbo Frederiksen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > 03/22/2007 06:30 AM > > Please respond to > > tuscany-user@ws.apache.org > > > > > > To > > <tuscany-user@ws.apache.org> > > cc > > > > Subject > > RE: SDO Java M3 Release Candidate RC1 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The testcase I used the last time does not function using SDO M3, but I > > guess It is because I can't just use XSDHelper.INSTANCE. I remember > > Frank > > mentioning something about helpercontexts. Have you got any > > documentation > > as to hov this is done. > > > > /Chr > > > > ps. the test case is the one from: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1113?page=com.atlassian.ji > > ra.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12473251 > > < > > https://webmail.topnordic.com/exchweb/bin/redir.asp?URL=https://issues.a > > pache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1113?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system > > .issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel%23action_12473251 > > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________ > > > > From: kelvin goodson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Fri 3/16/2007 9:14 AM > > To: tuscany-user@ws.apache.org > > Subject: Re: SDO Java M3 Release Candidate RC1 > > > > > > > > Christian, > > The required jars for EMF 2.2.2 and the SDO 2.1 API are packaged in > > the > > binary release. > > Regards, Kelvin. > > > > On 15/03/07, Christian Landbo Frederiksen < > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > What version of EMF and SDO api is needed for this release? > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: kelvin goodson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Sent: 15. marts 2007 16:42 > > > To: tuscany-dev; Tuscany Users > > > Subject: SDO Java M3 Release Candidate RC1 > > > > > > I have posted an SDO Java M3 release candidate here: > > > > > http://people.apache.org/~kelvingoodson/sdo_java/M3/RC1/<http://people.a > > > pache.org/%7Erobbinspg/M3-RC1/> > > > > > > Please take a look at this and try it out, so that I can pick up any > > > errors > > > quickly and move towards a vote on a proper release in the short term. > > > > > > Thanks, Kelvin. > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- Yang ZHONG --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
