And one more question: You mentioned annotations. Will JAXB 1.0.5 be
supported as well?

Thanks,
Radim

On 8/8/07, Radim Kolarik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Raymond,
>
> But what would happen if the JAXB classes would be handled as POJOs?
> Wouldn't it work anyway? My understanding is that the actual
> communication would be exchanging XMLs which do not fully comply with
> a specific schema, but wouldn't the objects get deserialized to proper
> JAXB classes on server anyway?
>
> Thanks,
> Radim
>
> On 8/8/07, Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Comments line.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Raymond
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Radim Kolarik" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: <tuscany-user@ws.apache.org>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2007 4:16 AM
> > Subject: Re: Services and WSDL files
> >
> >
> > > Hi Ant,
> > >
> > > That is great news! Thanks!
> > >
> > > It's just POJOs and possibly JAXB objects as well for now. Is there
> > > any difference between POJOs and JAXB objects, regarding WSDL type
> > > definition?
> >
> > Yes, there is a big difference :-). The JAXB objects bear metadata (by
> > annotations) for the XSD definitions and JAXB defines the mapping rules for
> > Java/XML. In the POJO space, we don't have such a standard.
> >
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Radim
> > >
> > >
> > > On 8/8/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >> I'm looking at the on the fly wsdl generation right now. What type of
> > >> objects are used in your Java interfaces - just POJOs or SDOs or JAXB
> > >> objects or something else?
> > >>
> > >>   ...ant
> > >>
> > >> On 8/7/07, Radim Kolarik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> > I think we shouldn't mix two things together.
> > >> >
> > >> > 1) <interface.wsdl>, which you mentioned now, says that the interface
> > >> > of a particular service is wsdl interface (not java interface). In
> > >> > such case, I agree that the wsdl must exist and there is no
> > >> > anticipation to generate such interface on fly.
> > >> >
> > >> > 2) <binding.ws> where we want to expose existing service with
> > >> > interface written in java, as a web service. In such case the
> > >> > interface is described by annotated java class. At the moment, it is
> > >> > necessary to specify wsdl parameter like this:
> > >> >
> > >> > wsdlElement="
> > >> > http://helloworld#wsdl.port(HelloWorldService/HelloWorldServiceSOAP11port)
> > >> > "
> > >> >
> > >> > which points to an existing WSDL, rather than WSDL being generated on
> > >> > the fly, from existing java interface. This is by the way how Axis2
> > >> > works; the services are described in services.xml file and there is no
> > >> > need to write WSDL from them separately, it is generated on the fly.
> > >> > It should be possible to use <binding.ws/> without any parameters,
> > >> > which would seamlessly expose the service as a web service, without
> > >> > need to generate WSDL file separately and manually.
> > >> >
> > >> > So in ideal situation, .composite file would look like this:
> > >> >
> > >> > <composite xmlns="http://www.osoa.org/xmlns/sca/1.0";
> > >> >         targetNamespace="http://helloworld";
> > >> >         xmlns:hw="http://helloworld";
> > >> >     name="helloworldws">
> > >> >
> > >> >     <component name="HelloWorldServiceComponent">
> > >> >             <service name="HelloWorldService">
> > >> >                 <interface.java
> > >> > interface="helloworld.HelloWorldService"/>
> > >> >           <binding.ws
> > >> > wsdlElement="
> > >> > http://helloworld#wsdl.port(HelloWorldService/HelloWorldServiceSOAP11port)
> > >> > "/>
> > >> >             </service>
> > >> >       <implementation.java class="helloworld.HelloWorldImpl" />
> > >> >     </component>
> > >> >
> > >> > </composite>
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > Best regards,
> > >> > Radim
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > On 8/7/07, shaoguang geng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >> > > This feature has been inquired seval times. Unfortunately, there is a
> > >> > wound in SCA1.0's <interface.wsdl> specification. It requires a uri
> > >> > like
> > >> > attribute which point to a wsdl infact. It means there should exist a
> > >> > wsdl
> > >> > already so that <interface.wsdl> could refer to.
> > >> > > But how will it make sence, if the service generate wsdl "on fly"
> > >> > > again.
> > >> > SCA-WebServiceBinding_V100 does metioned this "on fly" feathre as you
> > >> > said,
> > >> > but as my opinion is, it is just a cross work, of no value.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Or SCA's spec might get improved in the near future.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, Radim.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > I'm not very sure if we already have the support to deploy an SCA
> > >> > service as
> > >> > > a web service without WSDL. If not, that's something we want to
> > >> > > support
> > >> > for
> > >> > > sure.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > We have a sample to demonstrate the usage of SCA, web service and
> > >> > > SDO.
> > >> > It
> > >> > > seems to be what you are looking for. You can see the sample code at:
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/java/sca/samples/helloworld-ws-sdo
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Thanks,
> > >> > > Raymond
> > >> > >
> > >> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > >> > > From: "Radim Kolarik"
> > >> > > To:
> > >> > > Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2007 7:38 AM
> > >> > > Subject: Services and WSDL files
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > > > Hi,
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > Is it necessary to supply wsdl file if I want to deploy an SCA
> > >> > > > service
> > >> > as
> > >> > > > a
> > >> > > > web service? Or can Tuscany generate the file "on the fly"?
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > If I need to supply the file myself, what would be the best way to
> > >> > > > generate
> > >> > > > the file? Is it possible to generate the file for SDOs, if they are
> > >> > > > service
> > >> > > > parameters or if a service returns an SDO object as its result?
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > Thanks,
> > >> > > > Radim
> > >> > > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >> > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > > ---------------------------------
> > >> > > Pinpoint customers who are looking for what you sell.
> > >> >
> > >> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to