On Monday 22 October 2007 01:51:03 Dane Mutters wrote: > I think that there is an occasional need to check the file system for > errors, but I think that it might work better as an optional, but > "highly recommended" thing. > > Here's another case in point: > > I have been working to set up an Ubuntu-based Asterisk phone server at > my workplace. For this application, having to wait even 1 minute for > the system to reboot (if necessary) is barely tolerable, but if it ever > has to be restarted for any reason, and then insists on spending the > next 5 minutes doing a fsck, thus rendering the business phone-less, > that would surely make my employers very frustrated. > > I'm sure this has already been discussed, but I wish to add my opinion > to that of others who believe that a better solution is needed. Surely, > fsck is a really good idea, but for certain uses of Ubuntu, it's really > not practical. I'm sure that something else can be devised. > > Keep up the good work. > > --Dane
Dane , you can manually bypass this by using tune2fs, and disable the fsck on your server. -- BUGabundo :o) (``-_-´´) http://Ubuntu.BUGabundo.net Linux user #443786 GPG key 1024D/A1784EBB My new micro-blog @ http://BUGabundo.net
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
