On Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 7:13 PM Steve Langasek <steve.langa...@canonical.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 11:29:34AM -0400, Nick Rosbrook wrote: > > > ## libxsmm FTBFS (https://pad.lv/1984111) > > > This FTBFS with an undefined reference to pthread_yield. Upstream > > already has fixes for this, so I cherry-picked those. > > > I am still looking for a sponsor for this patch. > > Thanks, sponsored.
Thanks! > > ## python-duniterpy breaks silkaj autopkgtest (https://pad.lv/1984122) > > > The immediate cause is the BlockUID type being changed to BlockID, but > > the upstream commit that resolves this does not apply cleanly to > > v0.9.0. The best resolution here is probably to wait for v0.10.0 to be > > packaged in Debian unstable (currently in experimental). > > I guess the reason for not syncing from experimental is that the package > there is only an RC version and not 0.10.0 release? Yes, that's right. > > ## bpftrace FTBFS (https://pad.lv/1985648) > > > The bpftrace-aotrt binary is built conditionally, but debian/rules > > always attempts to strip it. This can be fixed by stripping the binary > > only if the file exists. However, if my patch is applied this package > > will still FTBFS on armhf and s390x due to libbpfcc-dev dep-wait. > > > I am still looking for a sponsor for this patch. > > Commented on the bug. If the file is being built in Debian but not in > Ubuntu, we should aim to fix the root issue. Thanks for your review. Your suggestion makes more sense. > (BTW, being dep-wait on an architecture where the package has never built is > not a concern for +1 maintenance.) Ah, thanks for pointing that out. When the package didn't build on those arches in my PPA, I failed to notice that it has never built on those arches. -Nick -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel